What We Are Not Saying!
By: David Pizer
What we are NOT saying when we talk about wanting
reforms at Alcor:
We are NOT saying that any certain Director wants to
harm Alcor on purpose.
We are NOT saying that any certain Director makes
mistakes deliberately.
We are NOT saying that some Directors have intentions
to damage Alcor.
I may not be speaking for all Alcor Reformers when I
tell you what I think we Reformers are not saying.
But I think I speak for a lot of Reformers when I say
that when Reformers talk about things that they think
are wrong at Alcor they normally are NOT trying to
show contempt for, or trying to insult, any
particular individual Director. We are trying to show
that things are not getting done in the best possible
way that they could be done because there is a basic
flaw in the core of Alcor‘s basic undercarriage of the
management system.
Let me tell you WHY I think Directors do not do as
good a job for Alcor as we would like them to do -
maybe as good a job as they would like to have done
themselves:
I believe that ALL Directors probably have the best
possible intentions when they first take their seat on
the Alcor Board of Directors. They want to do things
to make Alcor grow in membership, public reputation
and financial strength. They want alcor to prosper
and survive until some time in the future when the
patients can be restored to vigorous health and
well-being. They want Alcor to survive because they
want to survive, and they know that they, along with
the rest of us, will be Alcor patients someday. They
are willing to put in time and sometimes their own
personal resources. Many of them never receive a
salary or expenses for their efforts
But judging from what some members feel is a very
poor record of performance, (which I have given many
examples of elsewhere on this site), some Alcor
members have come to the opinion that something
happens to the Directors after they have been on the
Board for a while. Now, it may be true that many
Directors do NOT have much experience in successfully
running a business, and that may be one reason why
they have done so badly, but I believe their record of
so many mistakes, so much money being lost, wasted or
stolen has got to have some additional causes.
I believe we should have more representation or
successful business people, but I don't believe that
all 9 Board seats should be filled by people with
successful experience in running businesses, there
should be representatives from the medical and
scientific community as well. Perhaps about 50 % of
the Board members should have an impressive
experience record in running businesses so that the
Board will have enough different opinions in
overcoming the business challenges it faces throughout
the years.
Here is my opinion of what happens to the new
Directors. An Alcor member becomes interested in
trying to help Alcor. For whatever reasons, he gets
elected to the Board. He attends his first Board
Meeting full of enthusiasm, good intentions and
energy. He attends all the meetings and puts in his
time, Although his intentions are good, things don't
seem to be getting any better. In fact many
indicators start to show that things are getting
worse.
Alcor members, some of the Alcor Advisors and some
Staff members start to give him proposals on what he
should do to make things better. But because he has
little experience in making successful business
decisions he does not know which suggestions are good
ones an which ones are not.
As things seem to get worse and worse for Alcor, the
members become more dissatisfied with the Directors'
actions and performance. The members begin to
criticize them or their actions. Some members begin
to become more assertive with their suggestions.
After all, the members are depending on Alcor to save
their lives. They have a lot at stake.
Eventually the members become very disappointed with
the performance of the Director. The more they
express unhappiness, point our symptoms of internal
problems, and protest, the more the Director seems to
dislike and ignore those members who are petitioning
them the most. It is a spiraling cycle. What feeds
the destructive process and allows it to escalate is
the fact that all Directors realize, from the day they
take office, that they don't have to answer to the
members. They don't have to answer to anyone.
They can blame the poor performance of Alcor on the
environment that Alcor is in, or the distrust by
officials, the media and politicians. They blame it
on anyone and everyone except themselves. But they're
the ones who should build trust in the minds of the
officials, change the attitude in the environment, win
over the media and politicians.
Alcor is a unique company, unlike many companies where
the top leaders have some level of accountability.
Directors in many companies have to answer to the
stockholders, who can vote them out if they don't
perform well for the company, but there are no
stockholders in Alcor. In some nonprofit companies,
the Directors have to answer to the members. In those
companies the members can vote replacements for poor
performing Directors each year at election time - not
at Alcor.
What I am saying here is that I believe the key to the
problem of why the Directors become the way that they
do is because they realize that no one can hold them
accountable for their mistakes. So even though they
start out with the best of intentions, they really
mean to do well, when the first mistakes start to
happen and they would do well to listen to
suggestions from the membership, they feel that they
don't have to if they don't want to. When you don't
listen to others, you loose some of the resources
available, and without as many resources you don't
have all the tools you need to do the best possible
job. I believe that if the Directors felt more
accountable to the members, they would listen to the
members better, work harder to find solutions to the
problems, and be more careful when they made
decisions.
And for those Directors that it turns out are just not
capable even though they wish they were, a system
where the members do the voting would be a system to
replace the Directors whose performance is
substandard. At election time, members could simply
vote in a replacement who is better qualified.
There are things Alcor members can do when they feel
that the Directors are not doing a good job, they can
leave.
Leaving Alcor is what Alcor members seem to have been
doing lately. For every two people who join Alcor
lately, one person leaves. To me that says that
people are coming to Alcor because they like the
beautiful concept that cryonics embodies - a chance
for survival and travel to a time in the future. But
after they are in Alcor for a while, about half of
them leave. Cryonics attracts people who yearn for
freedom, freedom from death, or at least freedom to
choose one's time of death. The dictatorship style of
management at Alcor gives the least possible freedom
to the members, they are not free to choose the people
they want to lead the company that they are trusting
with their lives.
Some members who don't want to leave Alcor and they
don't like to see her going downhill have another
idea. They say: 'Let's take the issues to the
membership.' Let's gather the evidence, check it
over, consider the reasons why things are not better,
and then discuss how we can make Alcor better with the
membership. That's what ReformAlcor is all about. We
are the members who think that careful discussion with
respect to everyone's opinions and a forum to express
concerns and suggestions for reform is the best way to
start to make things better for Alcor.
So what am I NOT saying.?
I am NOT saying that some Directors are making grave
mistakes on purpose.
I am Not saying that some Directors, whose actions
hurt Alcor, intend to hurt Alcor
I am saying that we need more Directors with
successful business experience AND we need a system to
motivate those people that do get on the Board, and
want to stay on the Board, to do a better job. The
system that will help do both of these is the one
where the members elect (and re-elect) the Directors.
That is the system that will increase YOUR odds of
survival. The system that will not help make Alcor
better is the present one where Directors keep
re-electing themselves no matter how bad their
performance is. That is the system that will increase
our odds of having to be dead forever.
Click Here to Discuss this Article
|